Examiner Bryce P Bonzo has allowed 648 of 740 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Bryce P Bonzo has a public record spanning three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 740 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 648, yielding an allowance rate of 88%. The allowance rate ranges from 87% to 90% across the examiner's art units. This pooled figure aggregates decisions across all three art units and reflects the overall historical record without prediction of outcome in any specific case.
A pooled record aggregates allowance data across multiple art units, producing a single average rate. This figure describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rates vary by art unit; the range reported (87% to 90%) indicates this variation. Pooled statistics provide historical context only and do not account for differences in individual application facts, claim scope, or examination circumstances.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 609 without.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Bryce P Bonzo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 758 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP