Examiner Bunjob Jaroenchonwanit has allowed 22 of 29 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Bunjob Jaroenchonwanit maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 3 art units: 2141, 2143, and 2152. Across 29 disposed applications, 22 were allowed and 7 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 76%. This figure represents the percentage of all decided applications in the examiner's pooled record and is calculated from the applications that received final dispositions, excluding any pending matters.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units into a single allowance figure. The 76% allowance rate reflects all decided applications across art units 2141, 2143, and 2152 combined. This historical aggregate describes the examiner's past record and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Individual art-unit performance may differ from the pooled figure.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Bunjob Jaroenchonwanit has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 29 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP