Examiner Cam Quy Thi Truong has allowed 786 of 910 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Cam Quy Thi Truong holds a public record of 910 disposed applications across four art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 786 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 86%. The examiner's record spans art units 2127, 2193, 2195, and 2196. Allowance rates across these art units range from 84% to 91%, reflecting variation in the composition and outcomes of applications handled within each unit.
This pooled record aggregates applications across multiple art units within TC 2100, combining different subject areas and application profiles into a single profile. The 86% allowance rate describes past dispositions—allowed applications as a share of all decided cases—and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Pooled figures mask individual art-unit variation; allowance rates across the examiner's units range from 84% to 91%.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 186 decided applications with an interview and 326 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 57 decided applications with an interview and 184 without.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 27 decided applications with an interview and 129 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Cam Quy Thi Truong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 910 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP