Examiner Canh Le

What the data says.

Examiner Canh Le holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, 23 applications have been disposed. Of those decided applications, 3 were allowed and 20 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 13%. This figure describes the pooled historical record and does not constitute a prediction for any pending or future application.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates dispositions from a single art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 13% is a historical average calculated from 23 decided applications and reflects past outcomes in that art unit. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any particular case. Applicants review public records to understand an examiner's historical patterns, which remain correlational data only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Canh Le

• 01What is Examiner Canh Le's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 13%, based on 23 disposed applications (3 allowed, 20 abandoned). This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record covers one art unit (2139) within Technology Center 2100. The figures aggregate all dispositions within that single art unit.
• 03What does the allowance rate tell me?

  The allowance rate describes the share of decided applications that were allowed in the past. It is a correlational statistic based on historical data and does not indicate the outcome of any pending application.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.