Examiner Cao Dang Vuong has allowed 79 of 114 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Cao Dang Vuong holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 141 total applications, 79 were allowed and 35 were abandoned, yielding 114 disposed applications. The allowance rate—the percentage of decided applications that were allowed—stands at 69%. This rate is calculated from the 114 disposed applications and does not include pending filings. The examiner's record spans a single art unit.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 69% describes the examiner's historical disposed applications and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate figures reflect past decisions across multiple application types and do not forecast prosecution paths, interview outcomes, or individual case results. Each application proceeds on its own facts and claim presentation.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 68 decided applications with an interview and 46 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Cao Dang Vuong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 141 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP