LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/CARL E BARNES JR
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Carl E Barnes Jr

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 205 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Carl E Barnes Jr has allowed 68 of 205 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

33% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2177 · 28%AU 2178 · 42%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Carl E Barnes Jr maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across 2 art units. Over 205 decided applications, he has allowed 68, for an allowance rate of 33%. His allowance rate ranges from 28% to 42% across these art units. Of 251 total applications in his record, 137 were abandoned. This pooled figure represents his aggregate performance across both art units and does not break down performance by individual unit.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, showing overall allowance rate and range. The aggregate allowance rate (33% over 205 decided cases) describes past dispositions and is not a prediction for any specific application. The range (28% to 42%) reflects variation among the art units within the examiner's portfolio. Pooled figures are most useful as historical context; individual art-unit records provide art-specific detail.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2177
129 APPS · 28% ALLOWANCE
28% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION36 / 93 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.8 moart unit avg 22.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY46.1 moart unit avg 40.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility61% · art unit 40%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)92%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 90%
§112 — Written description & definiteness57%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW36%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW19%+17 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 70 decided applications with an interview and 59 without.

ART UNIT 2178
122 APPS · 42% ALLOWANCE
42% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 54%
DISPOSITION32 / 44 / 46allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION24.7 moart unit avg 25.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49.1 moart unit avg 41.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility51% · art unit 36%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)92%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness46%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW58%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW21%+37 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 43 decided applications with an interview and 33 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Carl E Barnes Jr

  • What is Carl E Barnes Jr's overall allowance rate?
    33% over 205 decided applications in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    2 art units (2177 and 2178).
  • What is the range of allowance rates across art units?
    Allowance rates range from 28% to 42% across the art units in this examiner's portfolio.
  • Does the pooled allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. The pooled rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Carl E Barnes Jr has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 251 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP