Examiner Chad Davidson has allowed 55 of 84 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Chad Davidson's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 84 disposed applications, 55 were allowed and 29 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 65%. This figure represents the proportion of decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and excludes any pending matters. The record reflects outcomes in a single art unit over the period covered by this examiner's public statistics.
This pooled record aggregates all applications decided across the examiner's art units into a single allowance-rate figure. The 65% rate describes historical outcomes on disposed applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rates measure past prosecution results; they do not indicate how any individual application will be examined or decided. Review of the public record provides context only and cannot forecast results in any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 62 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Chad Davidson has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 84 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP