LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/CHAD DAVIDSON
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Chad Davidson

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 84 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2012
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Chad Davidson has allowed 55 of 84 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

65% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Chad Davidson's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 84 disposed applications, 55 were allowed and 29 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 65%. This figure represents the proportion of decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and excludes any pending matters. The record reflects outcomes in a single art unit over the period covered by this examiner's public statistics.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications decided across the examiner's art units into a single allowance-rate figure. The 65% rate describes historical outcomes on disposed applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rates measure past prosecution results; they do not indicate how any individual application will be examined or decided. Review of the public record provides context only and cannot forecast results in any particular case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2187
84 APPS · 65% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

65% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION55 / 29 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION26.1 moart unit avg 23.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY43.7 moart unit avg 36.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility27% · art unit 39%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)40%
§103 — Obviousness93% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness27%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW86%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW58%+28 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 62 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Chad Davidson

  • What is Chad Davidson's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 65%, based on 84 disposed applications (55 allowed, 29 abandoned). This percentage describes decided applications only and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Chad Davidson's record spans one art unit (2187) within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) that resulted in allowance. It describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of outcomes in any pending or future application.
  • Does this rate apply to my application?
    Historical allowance rates describe past outcomes and are not predictions of any individual application's result. Each application is examined on its own merits.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Chad Davidson has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 84 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP