LYNCH·LLP
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Chad Rapp

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 417 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUL 2016
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Chad Rapp has allowed 345 of 417 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

83% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2121 · 77%AU 2125 · 96%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Chad Rapp maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 417 disposed applications, 345 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 83%. The allowance rate across his art units ranges from 77% to 96%, reflecting variation in the decided record within TC 2100. This pooled figure aggregates his work across multiple art units and describes his historical disposal record without bearing on any individual pending application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines an examiner's allowance data across multiple art units into a single aggregate figure. The overall allowance rate reflects the examiner's past decisions on disposed applications—allowed plus abandoned—and does not predict outcomes in any specific application. The range of rates across art units shows variation within the examiner's portfolio. Aggregate statistics describe historical performance and are correlational, not causal.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2121
290 APPS · 77% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

77% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION223 / 67 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION24.5 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39.4 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility13% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)38%
§103 — Obviousness92% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness40%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW94%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW75%+19 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 32 decided applications with an interview and 258 without.

ART UNIT 2125
127 APPS · 96% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

96% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 75%
DISPOSITION122 / 5 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.4 moart unit avg 26.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY29.2 moart unit avg 39 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Chad Rapp

  • What is Chad Rapp's overall allowance rate?
    His overall allowance rate is 83%, based on 345 allowed applications out of 417 disposed applications in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does Chad Rapp work in?
    He maintains a public record across 2 art units (2121 and 2125) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary across his art units?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 77% to 96% across his art units, indicating variation in the decided record within TC 2100.
  • What does this pooled record mean for my application?
    This pooled figure describes the examiner's historical disposal record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Chad Rapp has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 417 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP