LYNCH·LLP
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Chad Zhong

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 32 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION FEB 2006
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Chad Zhong has allowed 5 of 32 decided applications (16%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

16% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Chad Zhong's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans a single art unit. Across 32 disposed applications, he issued 5 allowances, yielding an allowance rate of 16 percent. The remaining 27 applications were abandoned. This rate represents the examiner's pooled record across all art units under his jurisdiction. The figures describe past dispositions only and are not predictive of any individual application's outcome.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates Zhong's record across all art units in which he works. The allowance rate of 16 percent reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications in the pooled historical data. Pooled figures represent cumulative activity across different art units and subject areas and serve as a statistical summary of past performance. They do not predict the outcome of any specific application or indicate how any particular case will be examined.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2152
32 APPS · 16% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

16% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 49%
DISPOSITION5 / 27 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39.1 moart unit avg 28.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY53.5 moart unit avg 42.9 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Chad Zhong

  • What is Chad Zhong's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 16 percent, based on 5 allowed applications out of 32 disposed applications in the pooled record.
  • How many art units does Chad Zhong cover?
    Zhong works in one art unit (2152) within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of decided (disposed) applications that were allowed. It is calculated from allowed and abandoned applications only; pending applications are excluded. The rate describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of future results.
  • What subject matter does this examiner handle?
    Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Chad Zhong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 32 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP