Examiner Chae M Ko

What the data says.

Chae M Ko maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 929 total applications, 827 were allowed and 80 abandoned, yielding 907 disposed applications. The allowance rate is 91% of decided applications. The examiner's record spans one art unit, pooling outcomes across a single organizational group within TC 2100. This snapshot reflects historical dispositions and does not indicate what will occur in any particular pending or future application.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across their assigned art unit(s) within TC 2100. Aggregate allowance rates describe past outcomes pooled over time and subject matter within that unit. Figures are correlational summaries of the examiner's historical record, not predictions of outcome in any single case. Individual applications vary by claims, prior art, and office action responses.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.

Questions about Examiner Chae M Ko

• 01What is Chae M Ko's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 91%, calculated from 827 allowed applications and 80 abandoned applications out of 907 total decided applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  This examiner's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate mean for my application?

  The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record of decided cases. It is not a prediction of outcome in any specific application and does not account for individual claim scope, prior art, or prosecution history.
• 04What subject matter does this examiner handle?

  This examiner works in TC 2100, which covers Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.