Examiner Charles Edward Lu has allowed 278 of 447 decided applications (62%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Charles Edward Lu holds a public record of 447 disposed applications across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 278 were allowed and 169 were abandoned, for an allowance rate of 62%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall record across all art units under this examiner's jurisdiction. The record reflects decisions made on applications that have reached final resolution; applications pending at the time of this report are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
A pooled record aggregates statistics across multiple art units, combining different subject areas and application types into one overall profile. The figures presented—allowance rate, application count, and art-unit breadth—describe what occurred in the examiner's past decisions and are not predictions about how any specific pending application will be examined or decided. Individual art-unit data, where available separately, may show variation around the pooled average.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 220 decided applications with an interview and 220 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Charles Edward Lu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 447 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP