Examiner Charles Jeffrey Jones

What the data says.

Charles Jeffrey Jones maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 54 total applications, 17 have been disposed (decided). Of those 17 disposed applications, 6 were allowed and 11 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 35% over the decided count. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications in that unit and does not reflect pending applications, which remain undecided.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates all decided applications within the examiner's assigned art unit(s). The allowance rate of 35% describes past dispositions—allowed and abandoned applications—and is calculated only from the decided pool, excluding pending filings. Pooled figures represent historical outcomes and are not predictions of the outcome of any specific future application. Individual art-unit records, if available separately, may show variation.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Charles Jeffrey Jones

• 01What is Charles Jeffrey Jones's overall allowance rate?

  35% of his 17 disposed applications were allowed. This figure is drawn from the decided (allowed and abandoned) applications only and does not include pending cases.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  One art unit (Art Unit 2122), within TC 2100.
• 03What does this pooled record show?

  This record pools all applications across the examiner's art unit(s). The allowance rate and disposal counts are aggregated outcomes and describe historical dispositions, not predictions of future results on any particular application.
• 04How many applications has this examiner decided?

  17 applications have been disposed (decided). Of the examiner's 54 total applications, 11 were abandoned and 6 were allowed.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.