Examiner Chase Paul Hinckley

What the data says.

Chase Paul Hinckley maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 239 total applications, 208 have been disposed of (decided). Of those disposed applications, 143 were allowed and 65 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 69% over the decided count. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit, Art Unit 2124. This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final resolution.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art unit(s) and describes past outcomes only. The 69% allowance rate is a historical aggregate of decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation within individual art units; a separate section of this page provides per-art-unit detail. These statistics describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any particular prosecution.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Chase Paul Hinckley

• 01What is Chase Paul Hinckley's overall allowance rate?

  69%, calculated over 208 disposed (decided) applications, of which 143 were allowed and 65 were abandoned.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  One art unit: Art Unit 2124 in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
• 03What does this pooled record mean for my application?

  This pooled record describes historical aggregate outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application. Actual results depend on claim scope, prior art, and application-specific facts. Per-art-unit detail is provided separately on this page.
• 04How many applications has this examiner decided?

  208 applications have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned), out of 239 total applications in the examiner's record.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.