Examiner Chat C Do has allowed 224 of 442 decided applications (51%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Chat C Do maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 442 disposed applications, 224 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 51%. Across the examiner's art units, allowance rates range from 49% to 78%. The pooled figure reflects the aggregate record and does not represent a prediction of outcome for any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, presenting the examiner's overall allowance rate as a historical summary. The 51% figure describes past decisions on 442 disposed applications and reflects the combined result across different subject-matter areas. This aggregate is descriptive of prior work, not predictive of any specific application's fate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 118 decided applications with an interview and 301 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Chat C Do has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 467 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP