Examiner Chelcie L Daye has allowed 551 of 736 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Chelcie L Daye maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's pooled allowance rate is 75%, calculated across 736 disposed applications (allowed and abandoned combined). Of those decided applications, 551 were allowed and 185 abandoned. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This allowance rate reflects past dispositions and describes the examiner's decided caseload without reference to any pending applications.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across the examiner's art units and represents a historical summary. The 75% allowance rate describes applications already decided, not a prediction of any specific pending application's outcome. Pooled figures across multiple art units mask variation within individual art units; a separate section of this page provides per-art-unit detail. Aggregate statistics characterize the past record only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 290 decided applications with an interview and 446 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Chelcie L Daye has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 755 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP