Examiner Chinwendu C Okoronkwo

What the data says.

Examiner Chinwendu C Okoronkwo has a public record of 51 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 26 were allowed and 25 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 51%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects the examiner's historical decisions on applications that have reached final disposition—either allowance or abandonment—and does not include pending applications.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates examination activity across all art units under which the examiner has worked. The allowance rate and application counts describe what has occurred in the past and reflect the examiner's decided cases only. Aggregate figures from a pooled record are not predictions about the outcome of any specific application. Individual art units may show different patterns; detailed per-art-unit statistics appear in a separate section.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.

Questions about Examiner Chinwendu C Okoronkwo

• 01What is Examiner Okoronkwo's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 51%, based on 26 allowed applications and 25 abandoned applications out of 51 total disposed applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  This examiner's public record spans 1 art unit (Art Unit 2136) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate mean?

  The allowance rate is the percentage of applications that reached a final allowed decision, expressed as a share of all decided (disposed) applications. It does not include pending applications and is a historical measure, not a prediction for any individual case.
• 04Is this allowance rate typical for TC 2100?

  This record shows the examiner's past decisions only. Comparison with art-unit or technology-center averages appears in the detailed per-art-unit section of this page.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.