Examiner Chongshan Chen

What the data says.

Chongshan Chen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across 2 art units. Over 34 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 10 and abandoned 24, yielding an allowance rate of 29%. This rate reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The record spans art units 2162 and 2172 within TC 2100, aggregating outcomes across both units into a single pooled figure.

How to read these numbers.

This record presents a pooled allowance rate—a single figure combining all decided applications across multiple art units. Pooled rates aggregate different subject areas and examination contexts. The 29% figure describes what occurred in the examiner's past decided cases and is not a prediction of how any individual application will be examined or disposed. Art-unit-specific records, where available separately, may vary from this aggregate.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Chongshan Chen

• 01What is Chongshan Chen's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 29%, calculated from 10 allowed applications out of 34 disposed (decided) applications. Disposed applications exclude pending cases.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The record spans 2 art units (2162 and 2172) within Technology Center 2100. This pooled profile aggregates outcomes across both units.
• 03Does the 29% rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The 29% allowance rate describes historical outcomes in decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's disposition.
• 04Why are there more abandonments than allowances in this record?

  Of the 34 disposed applications, 24 were abandoned and 10 were allowed. Abandonments may result from applicant action, examiner rejections, or other prosecution events. The figures record what occurred; they do not explain the reasons.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.