Examiner Chris A Nelson

What the data says.

Chris A Nelson's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans one art unit. Across 22 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 45%, with 10 allowed and 12 abandoned. This allowance rate reflects decided applications only and does not include pending filings. The record aggregates work across the single art unit within TC 2100. These figures describe the examiner's historical record; they do not predict outcomes in any individual application.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across all art units under an examiner's name. The allowance rate shown here—45%—is calculated from all decided applications across these units combined. Pooled figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions of outcomes in any specific case. To understand performance in a particular art unit or technology area, consult the per-art-unit breakdown on this page.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.

Questions about Examiner Chris A Nelson

• 01What is Chris A Nelson's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 45%, based on 22 disposed applications (10 allowed, 12 abandoned). This figure reflects decided applications only and does not include pending cases.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  Chris A Nelson's public record covers one art unit within TC 2100. This profile is a pooled record across that single art unit.
• 03Does this record predict what will happen in my application?

  No. The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual case outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, arguments, and other factors unique to each application.
• 04What technology areas does this examiner handle?

  This examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.