Examiner Christian A Laforgia has allowed 49 of 77 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Christian A Laforgia holds a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 77 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 49 and abandoned 28, yielding an allowance rate of 64%. The allowance rate ranges from 62% to 67% across the examiner's art units. This pooled figure represents the aggregate record and does not predict outcomes in any specific application.
A pooled record aggregates statistics across multiple art units, masking variation among them. The overall allowance rate of 64% describes past dispositions across 77 applications in TC 2100 and is historical data only—not a forecast for any individual case. The range (62% to 67%) shows allowance rates differ among the examiner's art units but does not identify which unit has which rate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Christian A Laforgia has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 77 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP