LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/CHRISTIAN MAMDOUH BAKHIT
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Christian Mamdouh Bakhit

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 10 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION MAY 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Christian Mamdouh Bakhit has allowed 9 of 10 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

90% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Christian Mamdouh Bakhit maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Across 35 total applications, 10 applications have been disposed (decided). Of those 10 disposed applications, 9 were allowed and 1 was abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 90% over the decided count. The allowance rate figure reflects only applications with final dispositions and excludes pending cases. This pooled record aggregates activity within the assigned art unit during the period covered.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's public record is pooled across all assigned art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 90% is computed from decided applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and describes the historical record. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes for any individual application. Different art units within TC 2100 may have distinct subject matter and examination patterns. The pooled allowance rate represents overall performance across all assigned work.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2199
35 APPS · 90% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.

90% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 73%
DISPOSITION9 / 1 / 25allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION31.6 moart unit avg 25.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY40.2 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility60% · art unit 48%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)73%
§103 — Obviousness87% · art unit 89%
§112 — Written description & definiteness20%

Based on 35 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Christian Mamdouh Bakhit

  • What is this examiner's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 90%, based on 10 disposed applications (9 allowed, 1 abandoned). Allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not include pending cases.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This examiner's public record covers one art unit (2199) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the pooled record mean?
    The pooled record aggregates all activity across the examiner's assigned art unit(s). Figures shown are combined totals and do not break down performance by individual art unit.
  • Does the allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. The allowance rate is a historical statistic and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each application is examined on its individual merits.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Christian Mamdouh Bakhit has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 35 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP