Examiner Christian Mamdouh Bakhit has allowed 9 of 10 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Christian Mamdouh Bakhit maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Across 35 total applications, 10 applications have been disposed (decided). Of those 10 disposed applications, 9 were allowed and 1 was abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 90% over the decided count. The allowance rate figure reflects only applications with final dispositions and excludes pending cases. This pooled record aggregates activity within the assigned art unit during the period covered.
This examiner's public record is pooled across all assigned art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 90% is computed from decided applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and describes the historical record. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes for any individual application. Different art units within TC 2100 may have distinct subject matter and examination patterns. The pooled allowance rate represents overall performance across all assigned work.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.
Based on 35 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Christian Mamdouh Bakhit has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 35 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP