Examiner Christine Dang has allowed 62 of 109 decided applications (57%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Christine Dang maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 109 disposed applications, her allowance rate is 57%. This rate reflects 62 allowed applications and 47 abandonments across the pooled record. The figure is calculated from decided cases only and does not include pending applications. Her record spans multiple art units within TC 2100, aggregating examination activity across different subject areas within that technology center.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units where an examiner works, presenting an overall allowance rate derived from all decided applications in those units combined. This aggregate figure describes past examination outcomes and is not a prediction of how any specific application will be handled. Different art units may reflect different applicant behavior, claim complexity, or filing patterns. Aggregate statistics do not isolate performance in any single art unit or technology area.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 52 decided applications with an interview and 54 without.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Christine Dang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 109 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP