Examiner Christopher A Revak has allowed 227 of 257 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Christopher A Revak maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 257 disposed applications, 227 were allowed and 30 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 88%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications and does not represent a prediction for any specific case or a measure of all filings at the USPTO.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to an examiner and represents historical disposition statistics. The allowance rate—here 88% of 257 decided applications—describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of how any individual application will be examined or decided. Pooled figures reflect the examiner's overall record and do not isolate outcomes by art unit, technology, or application type.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 81 decided applications with an interview and 176 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Christopher A Revak has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 257 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP