Examiner Christopher Dillon Devore has allowed 5 of 11 decided applications (45%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Christopher Dillon Devore maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 54 total applications, 11 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 11 decided applications, 5 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 45%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications in that unit and does not constitute a prediction for any specific pending application.
This profile presents pooled data aggregated across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate of 45% describes the examiner's historical record of decided applications and reflects past outcomes only. Pooled figures do not account for variation by art unit, subject matter within TC 2100, or individual application characteristics. The record is correlational and is not a basis for predicting the disposition of any particular application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Christopher Dillon Devore has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 54 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP