Examiner Christopher J Brown

What the data says.

Christopher J Brown maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 74 disposed applications. Of those decided applications, 45 were allowed and 29 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 61%. This figure represents applications that received a final decision—either allowance or abandonment—and excludes any pending matters. The record reflects outcomes across all applications within his assigned art unit during the period covered.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications and outcomes across the examiner's assigned art unit(s). The allowance rate of 61% describes the historical ratio of allowed to decided applications and is a factual summary of past dispositions. Aggregate figures do not constitute predictions about any specific application's outcome. Different applications may proceed differently depending on claim scope, prior art, prosecution history, and examiner actions on each individual case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.

Questions about Examiner Christopher J Brown

• 01What is Christopher J Brown's overall allowance rate?

  His allowance rate is 61%, based on 45 allowed applications and 29 abandoned applications among 74 total disposed applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The public record spans one art unit (2134) within TC 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate include and exclude?

  The allowance rate includes only decided applications—those allowed or abandoned. Pending applications are excluded. The rate is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
• 04What technology does this examiner work on?

  Christopher J Brown examines applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.