Examiner Christopher J Fibbi has allowed 185 of 342 decided applications (54%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Christopher J Fibbi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 400 total applications, 342 have been disposed (decided). Of those decided applications, 185 were allowed and 157 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 54%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all work in that unit and represents the examiner's historical allowance rate on decided applications, not a prediction for any individual case.
This pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art unit(s). The allowance rate of 54% describes past dispositions on decided applications and reflects the examiner's historical record. Pooled statistics do not predict outcomes on any specific application. Individual art units may show different rates; see the per-art-unit section for unit-specific data if available.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 168 decided applications with an interview and 174 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Christopher J Fibbi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 400 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP