Examiner Christopher N Do has allowed 56 of 83 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Christopher N Do has a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 83 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 67%, meaning 56 applications were allowed and 27 abandoned. The allowance rate ranges from 54% to 73% across his art units, reflecting variation in outcomes between the different subject-matter areas in which he works. This pooled figure aggregates his record across all units and describes historical disposal outcomes without application to any pending matter.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's work across multiple art units and reflects past dispositions. The overall allowance rate—here, 67% across 83 decided applications—is a historical summary and is not predictive of any individual application's outcome. The range (54% to 73%) shows that different art units within TC 2100 have produced different allowance rates in this examiner's record. Pooled data does not isolate which art unit will examine a given application or how that specific unit's dynamics will affect prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 27 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Based on 24 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Christopher N Do has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 83 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP