LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/CHRISTOPHER S MCCARTHY
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Christopher S Mccarthy

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 1,163 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Christopher S Mccarthy has allowed 1,016 of 1,163 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

87% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2113 · 87%AU 2184 · 100%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Christopher S Mccarthy maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,163 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 1,016 and abandoned 147, yielding an 87% allowance rate. The record aggregates outcomes from art units 2113 and 2184. This pooled figure reflects decisions rendered across both art units and does not indicate the distribution of applications or allowance rates within each individual unit.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates examination outcomes across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 87% allowance rate describes past decisions on 1,163 disposed applications and reflects the combined history. Aggregate figures characterize the examiner's overall record and are not predictions about any specific application. Art-unit-specific records appear in separate sections and may differ from the pooled figure.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2113
1,189 APPS · 87% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.

87% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 79%
DISPOSITION1014 / 147 / 28allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.4 moart unit avg 21.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY34.3 moart unit avg 32.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility31% · art unit 37%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)80%
§103 — Obviousness65% · art unit 66%
§112 — Written description & definiteness22%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW83%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW89%-6 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 318 decided applications with an interview and 843 without.

ART UNIT 2184
2 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 78%
DISPOSITION2 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION33 moart unit avg 20.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCYart unit avg 31.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Christopher S Mccarthy

  • What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?
    Across 1,163 disposed applications in TC 2100, the examiner allowed 1,016 and abandoned 147, for an allowance rate of 87%.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner has a public record across 2 art units: 2113 and 2184, both within TC 2100.
  • Does this pooled rate apply to my application?
    The 87% rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual applications may be disposed differently.
  • Why are there different figures for total and disposed applications?
    Disposed applications (1,163) are those with final decisions—allowed or abandoned. Total applications (1,191) include pending matters and are excluded from allowance-rate calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Christopher S Mccarthy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,191 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP