LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/CHRYSTINE PHAM
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Chrystine Pham

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 43 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2007
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Chrystine Pham has allowed 7 of 43 decided applications (16%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

16% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2192 · 18%AU 2122 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Chrystine Pham maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 43 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 16%, with 7 allowed and 36 abandoned. This rate reflects the aggregate of applications decided across both art units under this examiner's jurisdiction. The pooled record spans a defined subset of the technology center's subject matter and represents completed prosecution activity across the covered art units.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates Chrystine Pham's record across multiple art units within TC 2100. Pooled figures describe historical disposition of completed cases and do not constitute a prediction for any individual application. Different art units may have distinct subject-matter scope and prosecution patterns. The aggregate allowance rate reflects past decisions across all covered units combined and serves as a descriptive summary of closed cases only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2192
40 APPS · 18% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines software engineering.

18% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION7 / 33 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION36 moart unit avg 29.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY50.9 moart unit avg 45.1 mo
ART UNIT 2122
3 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION0 / 3 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION36.6 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY38.8 moart unit avg 39.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Chrystine Pham

  • What is Chrystine Pham's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 16% over 43 disposed applications (7 allowed, 36 abandoned). This figure aggregates all decided cases across both art units and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • How many art units does Chrystine Pham cover?
    Chrystine Pham maintains a record across 2 art units (2122 and 2192) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate represent?
    The 16% rate represents the share of allowed applications among all decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) across both art units combined. It describes the historical record and is not predictive of outcomes on pending or future applications.
  • What is the technology center for this examiner?
    Chrystine Pham works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Chrystine Pham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 43 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP