Examiner Chun Kuan Lee has allowed 521 of 778 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Chun Kuan Lee holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 818 total applications, 521 were allowed and 257 were abandoned. Of the 778 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 67%. This rate represents the share of decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's pooled record across all assigned art units. The record spans one art unit in TC 2100.
This examiner's pooled record aggregates decisions across all art units to which they are assigned. The 67% allowance rate describes historical disposition data and does not constitute a prediction about any specific application. Allowance rates are computed from decided cases only, excluding pending applications. Pooled figures smooth variation across different art units but do not reveal per-unit patterns; those appear in separate per-art-unit sections of this profile.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 178 decided applications with an interview and 600 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Chun Kuan Lee has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 818 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP