Examiner Chung Cheng has allowed 22 of 31 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Chung Cheng maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 31 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 71%, with 22 allowed and 9 abandoned applications. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes on decided applications only and does not include pending filings. The allowance rate of 71% is a historical aggregate and is not predictive of outcomes on any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates statistics across all art units under an examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate shown—71% here—reflects past dispositions and describes what has occurred, not what will occur on any pending or future case. Aggregate figures mask variation within individual art units. This data is correlational and historical; it is not a basis for predicting the outcome of any specific application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Chung Cheng has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 31 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP