Examiner Cole Jiawei Wentzel has allowed 10 of 12 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Cole Jiawei Wentzel maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 41 total applications, 12 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 12 decided applications, 10 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 83%. The examiner works within a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications examined to final disposition and does not include pending cases.
This record aggregates data across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate of 83% describes the examiner's past record on decided applications and reflects historical outcomes only. Pooled figures do not isolate performance by individual art unit or technology area. The allowance rate is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application and does not account for claim complexity, prior art, or prosecution history of any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Based on 41 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Cole Jiawei Wentzel has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 41 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP