Examiner Cong Lac T Huynh has allowed 493 of 650 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Cong Lac T Huynh maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 650 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 493 and abandoned 157, yielding an allowance rate of 76%. This figure reflects decided applications only and represents the examiner's historical record across the pooled art units. The allowance rate is stable at 76% across the entire disposal record.
This record aggregates data from multiple art units, producing a single allowance rate that describes past dispositions. The pooled figure of 76% represents the examiner's overall allowance rate across all covered art units and is not a prediction of any specific application outcome. Individual art units within TC 2100 may have different rates; those details appear separately. Aggregate statistics describe historical performance only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 266 decided applications with an interview and 383 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Cong Lac T Huynh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 650 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP