Examiner Conrad R Pack has allowed 83 of 273 decided applications (30%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Conrad R Pack maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 273 applications. Of those decided applications, 83 were allowed and 190 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 30%. This rate reflects the ratio of allowed to all decided cases in the examiner's pooled record and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.
This record aggregates the examiner's performance across one art unit. The allowance rate of 30% describes the historical share of allowed applications among all decided cases and is based on completed prosecution history. Aggregate figures describe past record only and are not predictions about individual applications. Different art units may have different characteristics; the pooled figure represents the examiner's overall profile across assigned work.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 149 decided applications with an interview and 124 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Conrad R Pack has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 273 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP