LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/CORDELIA P K ZECHER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Cordelia P K Zecher

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 28 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Cordelia P K Zecher has allowed 11 of 28 decided applications (39%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

39% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Cordelia P K Zecher maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 28 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 11 and abandoned 17, yielding an allowance rate of 39%. This rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not include pending matters. The examiner's work spans a single art unit, providing a pooled record across that assignment within TC 2100.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates all applications across an examiner's assigned art units and reports historical allowance and abandonment figures. The allowance rate reflects past dispositions and describes the examiner's record to date. Pooled figures do not vary by individual art unit and are not predictions about the outcome of any specific application. They represent aggregate performance across the examiner's entire portfolio.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2132
28 APPS · 39% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

39% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION11 / 17 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION37.2 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49.8 moart unit avg 41 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Cordelia P K Zecher

  • What is Cordelia P K Zecher's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 39%, based on 11 allowed and 17 abandoned applications out of 28 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The examiner is assigned to one art unit within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate include pending applications?
    No. The allowance rate is calculated only from decided (disposed) applications—allowed and abandoned matters. Pending applications are excluded.
  • What is the subject matter of this examiner's art unit?
    The examiner works in TC 2100, covering Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Cordelia P K Zecher has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 28 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP