Examiner Cory A. Latham has allowed 27 of 36 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Cory A. Latham holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 36 disposed applications, 27 were allowed and 9 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 75%. This rate describes the examiner's historical record across decided cases and reflects outcomes in the assigned art units within TC 2100. The record covers all applications that reached a final decision; pending applications are excluded from this calculation.
This pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units assigned to this examiner. The allowance rate of 75% represents a historical summary of decided cases and does not predict the outcome of any individual application. Because the record combines different art units, the figure describes overall past performance. Specific application outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, specification support, and examiner decisions on statutory grounds in each case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Based on 35 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Based on 1 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Cory A. Latham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 36 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP