Examiner Courtney P Spann has allowed 243 of 298 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Courtney P Spann maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 336 total applications, 243 have been allowed and 55 abandoned, yielding 298 disposed applications. The examiner's allowance rate is 82% over those decided applications. The record spans a single art unit (2183), aggregating outcomes across all work in that unit. This pooled figure describes the historical record and does not predict outcomes on any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates all dispositions across an examiner's art units into a single allowance rate. The 82% figure reflects past decisions on 298 closed applications and is a historical snapshot, not a forecast. Pooled data obscures variation that may exist within individual art units. Understanding an examiner's record requires reviewing both the aggregate and, where available, unit-level detail to account for differences in subject matter and prosecution patterns.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 213 decided applications with an interview and 85 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Courtney P Spann has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 336 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP