LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/CRAIG E WALTER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Craig E Walter

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 81 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Craig E Walter has allowed 63 of 81 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

78% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Craig E Walter maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, 81 applications have been disposed. Of these decided applications, 63 were allowed and 18 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 78%. This rate—the percentage of allowed applications among all disposed matters—reflects the examiner's aggregate record over the period covered by this data. The figures represent historical outcomes only and do not characterize performance in any particular case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates dispositions across a single art unit within TC 2100. An examiner's allowance rate is calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and reflects past outcomes. Pooled figures do not predict results in any specific application, nor do they isolate the effect of any single prosecution practice. The allowance rate is a historical snapshot, not a forecast.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2188
81 APPS · 78% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

78% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION63 / 18 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION25.7 moart unit avg 26.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY43.5 moart unit avg 39.7 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW80%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW77%+3 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 15 decided applications with an interview and 66 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Craig E Walter

  • What is Craig E Walter's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 78%, based on 63 allowed applications out of 81 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record covers one art unit (2188) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What do these figures mean for my application?
    These statistics describe past outcomes in TC 2100 and are not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each application is examined on its own merits according to patent law and USPTO policy.
  • How many applications has this examiner handled?
    81 applications have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). 63 were allowed and 18 were abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Craig E Walter has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 81 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP