Examiner Dangelino N Gortayo has allowed 683 of 872 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Dangelino N Gortayo maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 896 total applications, 683 were allowed and 189 abandoned, yielding 872 disposed applications. The examiner's allowance rate is 78% of decided cases. The record spans a single art unit, aggregating examination activity across TC 2100 subject matter. This pooled figure describes the examiner's past disposition of applications and does not predict outcomes in any individual case.
This record aggregates examination activity across one art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 78% reflects outcomes in 872 decided applications—allowed and abandoned cases combined—and describes the examiner's historical record. Pooled figures across art units represent an overall snapshot and are not predictions for any specific application or art-unit subset. Individual case outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and applicant responses.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 470 decided applications with an interview and 402 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dangelino N Gortayo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 896 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP