LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/DANIEL BOKMIN KO
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Daniel Bokmin Ko

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 30 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2006
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Daniel Bokmin Ko has allowed 30 of 30 decided applications (100%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

100% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Daniel Bokmin Ko maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 30 disposed applications. Of those 30 decided applications, all 30 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 100%. The record contains no abandoned applications. This pooled figure represents an aggregate across the examiner's art-unit assignments and describes his historical record of decisions on applications that have reached final disposition.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art units in TC 2100 into a single historical snapshot. The 100% allowance rate reflects the proportion of decided applications that were allowed among all disposed cases. Pooled figures describe past decisions and do not constitute a prediction of the outcome of any individual application. Individual art units may have different records; detailed per-art-unit data appears separately.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2189
30 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 77%
DISPOSITION30 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION24.6 moart unit avg 26.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY32.1 moart unit avg 39 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Daniel Bokmin Ko

  • What is Daniel Bokmin Ko's overall allowance rate?
    His pooled allowance rate is 100%, based on 30 disposed applications, all of which were allowed.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The pooled record covers one art unit (2189) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does a high allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. Pooled historical allowance rates describe past decisions and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many applications are included in this record?
    This pooled record covers 30 disposed applications. Pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Daniel Bokmin Ko has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 30 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP