Examiner Daniel Calrissian Puentes has allowed 46 of 54 decided applications (85%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Patent Examiner Daniel Calrissian Puentes maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 54 disposed applications. Of these decided applications, 46 were allowed and 8 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 85%. This figure represents the examiner's historical record across all applications within his assigned art unit and does not predict the outcome of any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate reflects decided applications (allowed and abandoned combined) and excludes pending filings. Aggregate figures describe the examiner's past record only and are not predictions about any individual case. Patent prosecution outcomes depend on application-specific facts, claim scope, and prior art—not on historical statistics alone.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 19 decided applications with an interview and 35 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Daniel Calrissian Puentes has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 54 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP