Examiner Daniel Duc Tran has allowed 0 of 1 decided applications (0%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Daniel Duc Tran's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), encompassing one art unit. Across 45 total applications, 1 application was abandoned and 1 was disposed, yielding 1 decided application. The allowance rate among decided applications is 0%, meaning no applications were allowed. This pooled record reflects outcomes in TC 2100 and does not forecast results in any individual case.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to this examiner. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only—allowed and abandoned cases—and excludes pending matters. Aggregate figures describe historical outcomes and are correlational summaries of past decisions. They do not constitute a prediction of how any specific application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Based on 45 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Daniel Duc Tran has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 45 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP