Examiner Daniel L Hoang

What the data says.

Daniel L Hoang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning art unit 2136. Across 21 disposed applications, 6 were allowed and 15 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 29%. This record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; it does not include pending matters. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only and represents the examiner's historical record in this technology center.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across their assigned art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 29% describes outcomes on 21 closed applications and reflects past dispositions. Aggregate figures describe historical performance and are not predictions about any specific application. Individual art units may exhibit different rates; detailed breakdowns by art unit appear in separate sections.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.

Questions about Examiner Daniel L Hoang

• 01What is Daniel L Hoang's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 29%, based on 21 disposed applications (6 allowed, 15 abandoned). This describes closed cases and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  Daniel L Hoang's public record spans 1 art unit (2136) within Technology Center 2100. Pooled figures aggregate all decided applications within that unit.
• 03What does the allowance rate include?

  The allowance rate reflects only decided applications—allowed and abandoned matters. Pending applications are excluded from the calculation and from the disposed count.
• 04What is the technology center for this examiner?

  Daniel L Hoang examines applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.