Examiner Daniel Rodriguez has allowed 410 of 603 decided applications (68%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Daniel Rodriguez holds a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 603 decided applications, his allowance rate is 68%. This figure represents 410 allowed applications and 193 abandoned applications, pooled across all art units. The allowance rate ranges from 60% to 89% across these art units, reflecting variation in the decided record within TC 2100. These figures describe the examiner's historical record and are not predictions for any particular application.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, producing an overall allowance rate that reflects the examiner's combined history. The 68% figure is a backward-looking summary of decided cases and does not forecast the outcome of any specific application. The range (60% to 89%) shows that allowance rates differ among the individual art units included in this pool. Pooled statistics describe past disposition patterns, not individual case prospects.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 280 decided applications with an interview and 153 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 60 decided applications with an interview and 110 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Daniel Rodriguez has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 632 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP