Examiner Daniel W Kinsaul has allowed 150 of 227 decided applications (66%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Daniel W Kinsaul has a public record of 227 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 150 were allowed and 77 were abandoned, for an allowance rate of 66%. The examiner's work spans one art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications decided during the period covered, and is a summary of past dispositions only.
This record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 66% allowance rate describes the proportion of decided applications that resulted in allowance over the historical period of record. Pooled figures represent past outcomes and are not predictive of any specific application's fate. Individual art-unit records may show different rates and are available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 92 decided applications with an interview and 135 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Daniel W Kinsaul has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 227 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP