LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/DARAVANH PHAKOUSONH
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Daravanh Phakousonh

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 2 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Daravanh Phakousonh has allowed 1 of 2 decided applications (50%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

50% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Daravanh Phakousonh maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, the examiner has disposed of 2 applications, with an allowance rate of 50%. This rate reflects 1 allowed application among the 2 decided cases. The overall record spans 42 total applications filed. These figures describe the examiner's past record in TC 2100 and do not constitute a prediction for any individual application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units an examiner covers. The allowance rate shown here—50%—is calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and reflects historical dispositions. This aggregate figure describes past outcomes, not future results for any specific case. Different art units may show distinct patterns; this summary presents the combined picture only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2121
42 APPS · 50% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

50% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION1 / 1 / 40allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION35 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY47.7 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility78% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)97%
§103 — Obviousness95% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness49%

Based on 42 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Daravanh Phakousonh

  • What is Examiner Phakousonh's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 50%, based on 2 decided applications (1 allowed, 1 abandoned).
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's record spans 1 art unit (2121) within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate measure?
    The allowance rate measures the percentage of applications that were allowed among all decided cases (allowed plus abandoned). It does not include pending applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many total applications has this examiner handled?
    The examiner has handled 42 total applications. Of these, 2 have been decided (disposed); the remainder are either pending or closed by other means.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Daravanh Phakousonh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 42 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP