Examiner Dareaum A Nam has allowed 20 of 23 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Dareaum A Nam maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, the examiner's pooled record spans 23 disposed applications. Of those decided applications, 20 were allowed and 3 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 87%. This rate reflects the proportion of allowed applications among all decided cases in the examiner's record. The data represents historical disposition and does not predict outcomes in any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across one art unit. The allowance rate of 87% describes past dispositions across 23 decided applications and reflects the examiner's historical record to date. Aggregate figures summarize performance over time and are not forecasts for any specific pending or future application. Individual application outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Based on 23 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dareaum A Nam has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 23 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP