LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/DARRIN HOPE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Darrin Hope

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 463 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Darrin Hope has allowed 284 of 463 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

61% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2173 · 54%AU 2178 · 87%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Darrin Hope maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 463 decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate stands at 61%, meaning that 284 applications were allowed and 179 were abandoned. The allowance rate ranges from 54% to 87% across these art units, reflecting variation in outcomes between the two units in which the examiner has a substantial record.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates statistics across multiple art units and reflects past dispositions only. The overall allowance rate of 61% describes what occurred across all decided applications in this examiner's history and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Art-unit-level variation is reflected in the stated range; applicants may review individual art-unit data separately for more granular context.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2173
357 APPS · 54% ALLOWANCE
54% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 49%
DISPOSITION192 / 165 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION23.8 moart unit avg 25.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY51.3 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility31% · art unit 39%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)74%
§103 — Obviousness86% · art unit 87%
§112 — Written description & definiteness32%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW68%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW44%+24 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 145 decided applications with an interview and 212 without.

ART UNIT 2178
149 APPS · 87% ALLOWANCE
87% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 54%
DISPOSITION92 / 14 / 43allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.7 moart unit avg 25.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY31.7 moart unit avg 41.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility40% · art unit 36%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)67%
§103 — Obviousness85% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness42%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW88%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW86%+2 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 49 decided applications with an interview and 57 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Darrin Hope

  • What is Darrin Hope's overall allowance rate?
    61% across 463 decided applications in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Two art units (2173 and 2178) within TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 54% to 87% across these art units.
  • Does this record predict the outcome of my application?
    No. These figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Darrin Hope has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 506 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP