Examiner David E England

What the data says.

David E England has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 44 disposed applications, 13 were allowed and 31 were abandoned, for an allowance rate of 30%. This rate is calculated over the 44 decided applications only and does not include pending cases. The examiner's record spans one art unit, meaning all figures derive from a single organizational grouping within TC 2100.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to an examiner and describes their historical disposition pattern. The allowance rate reflects outcomes on applications already decided—allowed or abandoned—and does not predict the outcome of any pending or future application. Aggregate figures describe the past record; individual applications may result differently based on their specific claims, prior art, and prosecution history.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Questions about Examiner David E England

• 01What is David E England's overall allowance rate?

  30%, calculated across 44 disposed applications in TC 2100. This rate reflects decided cases only (allowed plus abandoned) and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  One art unit (2143) in Technology Center 2100. All figures on this page represent the pooled record across that single art unit.
• 03What do the allowed and abandoned counts mean?

  Of 44 decided applications, 13 resulted in allowance and 31 were abandoned. These counts describe the historical record and do not predict outcomes on new applications.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.