Examiner David Earl Ogg

What the data says.

David Earl Ogg maintains a public record across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 363 total applications, 276 were allowed and 51 were abandoned, yielding 327 disposed applications. The allowance rate stands at 84% of those decided applications. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall record aggregated across all art units under his jurisdiction and reflects historical outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units into a single figure. The allowance rate—here 84%—describes the proportion of decided applications that were allowed in the past and is calculated only from disposed (final) applications, not from total filings. This aggregate statistic is a historical summary and is not a prediction of the outcome of any particular application or art unit.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines electric power networks, supply, and distribution.

Questions about Examiner David Earl Ogg

• 01What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 84%, based on 327 disposed applications (allowed and abandoned combined). This figure reflects past outcomes and is not a prediction for any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  David Earl Ogg's record spans one art unit: 2119.
• 03What does the pooled allowance rate represent?

  The pooled rate aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's art units. It describes the historical proportion of allowed applications relative to total dispositions and does not forecast outcomes on individual cases.
• 04What is the subject matter of this examiner's jurisdiction?

  TC 2100, covering Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.