Examiner David J Wynne has allowed 62 of 109 decided applications (57%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
David J Wynne has a public record spanning 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 109 disposed applications, he allowed 62 and abandoned 47, for an allowance rate of 57%. The allowance rate ranges from 56% to 58% across his art units. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record in TC 2100 and reflects the outcome distribution of applications on which final action has been taken.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units under an examiner's jurisdiction. The overall allowance rate describes the past outcome distribution across disposed applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. When an examiner works in multiple art units, the pooled figure masks variation among those units; the range statistic shows this variation exists. Pooled data is historical, not prescriptive.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 26 without.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Based on 43 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner David J Wynne has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 109 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP